<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Smashbox Should Be Ashamed of O-Glow Blush</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thebeautybrains.com/2007/07/10/why-smashbox-should-be-ashamed-of-o-glow-blush/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thebeautybrains.com/2007/07/10/why-smashbox-should-be-ashamed-of-o-glow-blush/</link>
	<description>Cosmetic chemists answer your beauty product questions!  We are a group of cosmetic scientists who understand what the chemicals used in cosmetics really do, how products are tested, and what all the advertising means.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:42:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Halloween Beauty Science &#124; shiseidoskincare.info</title>
		<link>http://thebeautybrains.com/2007/07/10/why-smashbox-should-be-ashamed-of-o-glow-blush/comment-page-1/#comment-76772</link>
		<dc:creator>Halloween Beauty Science &#124; shiseidoskincare.info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 17:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebeautybrains.com/2007/07/10/why-smashbox-should-be-ashamed-of-o-glow-blush/#comment-76772</guid>
		<description>[...] so transpires that some shade changing cosmetics use this exact same pH reaction. For example, Smashbox Oglow blush turns red by employing this identical principle. It&amp;#8217s Boo-tiful [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] so transpires that some shade changing cosmetics use this exact same pH reaction. For example, Smashbox Oglow blush turns red by employing this identical principle. It&amp;#8217s Boo-tiful [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Halloween Beauty Science</title>
		<link>http://thebeautybrains.com/2007/07/10/why-smashbox-should-be-ashamed-of-o-glow-blush/comment-page-1/#comment-76695</link>
		<dc:creator>Halloween Beauty Science</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebeautybrains.com/2007/07/10/why-smashbox-should-be-ashamed-of-o-glow-blush/#comment-76695</guid>
		<description>[...] also so happens that some color changing cosmetics use this same pH reaction. For example, Smashbox Oglow blush turns red by using this same principle. It&#8217;s Boo-tiful [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] also so happens that some color changing cosmetics use this same pH reaction. For example, Smashbox Oglow blush turns red by using this same principle. It&#8217;s Boo-tiful [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clarins Catastrophe: A Product That Doesn’t Work For A Problem That Doesn’t Exist</title>
		<link>http://thebeautybrains.com/2007/07/10/why-smashbox-should-be-ashamed-of-o-glow-blush/comment-page-1/#comment-69818</link>
		<dc:creator>Clarins Catastrophe: A Product That Doesn’t Work For A Problem That Doesn’t Exist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2011 22:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebeautybrains.com/2007/07/10/why-smashbox-should-be-ashamed-of-o-glow-blush/#comment-69818</guid>
		<description>[...] So, I&#8217;m sure don&#8217;t really need to spend $40.00 for 3P Screen Mist. But I&#8217;m not sure who should be more ashamed: Clarins for this product or Smashbox for the way they marketed their O-glow blush. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So, I&#8217;m sure don&#8217;t really need to spend $40.00 for 3P Screen Mist. But I&#8217;m not sure who should be more ashamed: Clarins for this product or Smashbox for the way they marketed their O-glow blush. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Kind Of Cosmetics Did Your Great-Great-Great Grandmother Wear On Memorial Day? &#124; Blog on Health-Beauty</title>
		<link>http://thebeautybrains.com/2007/07/10/why-smashbox-should-be-ashamed-of-o-glow-blush/comment-page-1/#comment-54919</link>
		<dc:creator>What Kind Of Cosmetics Did Your Great-Great-Great Grandmother Wear On Memorial Day? &#124; Blog on Health-Beauty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 14:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebeautybrains.com/2007/07/10/why-smashbox-should-be-ashamed-of-o-glow-blush/#comment-54919</guid>
		<description>[...] but only by the &#8220;bad girls&#8221; of the time. Of course the look was much different than Smashbox O-Glow Blush because the red color was applied to the cheekbone in a little circle just beneath the outside [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] but only by the &#8220;bad girls&#8221; of the time. Of course the look was much different than Smashbox O-Glow Blush because the red color was applied to the cheekbone in a little circle just beneath the outside [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teri Dourmashkin</title>
		<link>http://thebeautybrains.com/2007/07/10/why-smashbox-should-be-ashamed-of-o-glow-blush/comment-page-1/#comment-47618</link>
		<dc:creator>Teri Dourmashkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebeautybrains.com/2007/07/10/why-smashbox-should-be-ashamed-of-o-glow-blush/#comment-47618</guid>
		<description>Thanks very much for your post and taking the time to photograph your demonstration.  The claims that skin care companies are making these days are becoming more and more exaggerated.  It is surprising that they are able to get away with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks very much for your post and taking the time to photograph your demonstration.  The claims that skin care companies are making these days are becoming more and more exaggerated.  It is surprising that they are able to get away with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

