<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Indoor Tanning Be Illegal?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thebeautybrains.com/2007/10/14/should-indoor-tanning-be-illegal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thebeautybrains.com/2007/10/14/should-indoor-tanning-be-illegal/</link>
	<description>Cosmetic chemists answer your beauty product questions!  We are a group of cosmetic scientists who understand what the chemicals used in cosmetics really do, how products are tested, and what all the advertising means.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:42:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: narek</title>
		<link>http://thebeautybrains.com/2007/10/14/should-indoor-tanning-be-illegal/comment-page-2/#comment-62367</link>
		<dc:creator>narek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 17:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebeautybrains.com/2007/10/14/should-indoor-tanning-be-illegal/#comment-62367</guid>
		<description>This is the best blog I&#039;ve come across on this subject.  There are some really smart people on here with exception to the Mori person.  How silly for someone to be promoting sun exposure (radiation), let alone tanning.  The World Health Organization concluded that tanning booths definately &quot;are&quot; causing melanoma, especially in young women.  

That&#039;s right Mori, this is a fact concluded by one of the most credible organizations in the world and you are responsible for encouraging cancer causing radiation for health.  Did you know UVR is listed on the government carcinogen list as a definate cancer causer, right along with tobacco?  

It wasn&#039;t that long ago that the tobacco industry&#039;s doctors and scientists were saying cigarettes didn&#039;t cause cancer.  I remember people who really believed those so-called experts and kept right on smoking to keep their weight under control.

The Skin Cancer Foundation stated:  &quot;The latest figures confirm that skin cancer, the world&#039;s most common cancer, is truly an epidemic.  There are more new cases annually than the combined incidence of cancers of the breast, prostate, lung, and colon.  While skin cancer, particularly nonmelanoma skin cancer, is usually very treatable when caught early, it should not be taken lightly.  Skin cancers have a high rate of recurrence, and anyone who has had one runs an increased risk of developing another skin cancer, including melanoma.  Additionally, people who have had nonmelanoma skin cancer have twice the risk of developing other malignancies, such as lung, colon, and breast cancers.  Melanoma, the deadliest skin cancer, may metastasize (spread) to distant tissues or organs, and can be life-threatening, if not detected and treated quickly.&quot;

Every hour in the U.S. someone dies of melanoma and is a particularly cruel form of cancer.  U.V.R. is also cumulative.  Your skin never forgets.  And most people have already had way too much sun exposure.

Dr. Michael F. Holick has been promoting vitamin D through sun and tanning bed exposure for years in the media, like Reader&#039;s Digest, while actively promoting himself.  He is selling books like &quot;The UV Advantage&quot; and is also being paid by the tanning industry.  He posed in a tanning bed posted on USA Today.  This guy is one of the top experts vitamin D enthusiasts are relying on.

This is not different than the dangers of cigarettes and the government should ban tanning solons from anyone under 20, at least.  This is a no brainer:  Get your vitamin D from diet and supplements!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the best blog I&#8217;ve come across on this subject.  There are some really smart people on here with exception to the Mori person.  How silly for someone to be promoting sun exposure (radiation), let alone tanning.  The World Health Organization concluded that tanning booths definately &#8220;are&#8221; causing melanoma, especially in young women.  </p>
<p>That&#8217;s right Mori, this is a fact concluded by one of the most credible organizations in the world and you are responsible for encouraging cancer causing radiation for health.  Did you know UVR is listed on the government carcinogen list as a definate cancer causer, right along with tobacco?  </p>
<p>It wasn&#8217;t that long ago that the tobacco industry&#8217;s doctors and scientists were saying cigarettes didn&#8217;t cause cancer.  I remember people who really believed those so-called experts and kept right on smoking to keep their weight under control.</p>
<p>The Skin Cancer Foundation stated:  &#8220;The latest figures confirm that skin cancer, the world&#8217;s most common cancer, is truly an epidemic.  There are more new cases annually than the combined incidence of cancers of the breast, prostate, lung, and colon.  While skin cancer, particularly nonmelanoma skin cancer, is usually very treatable when caught early, it should not be taken lightly.  Skin cancers have a high rate of recurrence, and anyone who has had one runs an increased risk of developing another skin cancer, including melanoma.  Additionally, people who have had nonmelanoma skin cancer have twice the risk of developing other malignancies, such as lung, colon, and breast cancers.  Melanoma, the deadliest skin cancer, may metastasize (spread) to distant tissues or organs, and can be life-threatening, if not detected and treated quickly.&#8221;</p>
<p>Every hour in the U.S. someone dies of melanoma and is a particularly cruel form of cancer.  U.V.R. is also cumulative.  Your skin never forgets.  And most people have already had way too much sun exposure.</p>
<p>Dr. Michael F. Holick has been promoting vitamin D through sun and tanning bed exposure for years in the media, like Reader&#8217;s Digest, while actively promoting himself.  He is selling books like &#8220;The UV Advantage&#8221; and is also being paid by the tanning industry.  He posed in a tanning bed posted on USA Today.  This guy is one of the top experts vitamin D enthusiasts are relying on.</p>
<p>This is not different than the dangers of cigarettes and the government should ban tanning solons from anyone under 20, at least.  This is a no brainer:  Get your vitamin D from diet and supplements!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Law Limits Tanning Time &#124; Fitness Lifestyle Health Club</title>
		<link>http://thebeautybrains.com/2007/10/14/should-indoor-tanning-be-illegal/comment-page-2/#comment-53967</link>
		<dc:creator>New Law Limits Tanning Time &#124; Fitness Lifestyle Health Club</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 21:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebeautybrains.com/2007/10/14/should-indoor-tanning-be-illegal/#comment-53967</guid>
		<description>[...] blogged before about whether or not indoor tanning should be illegal and now, according to, The Dermatology Times, there is a new law under consideration by Congress [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blogged before about whether or not indoor tanning should be illegal and now, according to, The Dermatology Times, there is a new law under consideration by Congress [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Law Limits Tanning Time &#124; Beauty Aware</title>
		<link>http://thebeautybrains.com/2007/10/14/should-indoor-tanning-be-illegal/comment-page-2/#comment-53955</link>
		<dc:creator>New Law Limits Tanning Time &#124; Beauty Aware</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 13:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebeautybrains.com/2007/10/14/should-indoor-tanning-be-illegal/#comment-53955</guid>
		<description>[...] blogged before about whether or not indoor tanning should be illegal and now, according to, The Dermatology Times, there is a new law under consideration by Congress [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blogged before about whether or not indoor tanning should be illegal and now, according to, The Dermatology Times, there is a new law under consideration by Congress [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Law Limits Tanning Time</title>
		<link>http://thebeautybrains.com/2007/10/14/should-indoor-tanning-be-illegal/comment-page-2/#comment-53942</link>
		<dc:creator>New Law Limits Tanning Time</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 06:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebeautybrains.com/2007/10/14/should-indoor-tanning-be-illegal/#comment-53942</guid>
		<description>[...] blogged before about whether or not indoor tanning should be illegal and now, according to, The Dermatology Times, there is a new law under consideration by Congress [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blogged before about whether or not indoor tanning should be illegal and now, according to, The Dermatology Times, there is a new law under consideration by Congress [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jordan</title>
		<link>http://thebeautybrains.com/2007/10/14/should-indoor-tanning-be-illegal/comment-page-2/#comment-40695</link>
		<dc:creator>jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 20:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebeautybrains.com/2007/10/14/should-indoor-tanning-be-illegal/#comment-40695</guid>
		<description>and indoor tanning now compared to what it was years ago has improved dramatically !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and indoor tanning now compared to what it was years ago has improved dramatically !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

