<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EWG Misleads Consumers about Parabens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thebeautybrains.com/2008/11/05/ewg-misleads-consumers-about-parabens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thebeautybrains.com/2008/11/05/ewg-misleads-consumers-about-parabens/</link>
	<description>Cosmetic chemists answer your beauty product questions!  We are a group of cosmetic scientists who understand what the chemicals used in cosmetics really do, how products are tested, and what all the advertising means.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:42:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heidi</title>
		<link>http://thebeautybrains.com/2008/11/05/ewg-misleads-consumers-about-parabens/comment-page-1/#comment-58053</link>
		<dc:creator>Heidi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 20:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebeautybrains.com/?p=3635#comment-58053</guid>
		<description>&quot;It’s just that there are NO cosmetics that are more safe than others. The only way to be completely safe is to stop using cosmetics.&quot;

Oh, and that. That is silly. You mean you really can&#039;t rank a list of ingredients in certain ratios by their safety? I&#039;m pretty sure you can, if you have sufficient research. And for the record, I don&#039;t believe there is a whole lot of conclusive research on the danger of parabens, I just don&#039;t think that makes them automatically safe. Neither does a fairly weak sampling of 20 girls with methylparaben in their blood. But still, it&#039;s not &quot;misleading...&quot; and the fact that parabens have been flagged as potentially dangerous makes me interested in what further research proves, as opposed to interested in pointing and laughing at those who are worried.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It’s just that there are NO cosmetics that are more safe than others. The only way to be completely safe is to stop using cosmetics.&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh, and that. That is silly. You mean you really can&#8217;t rank a list of ingredients in certain ratios by their safety? I&#8217;m pretty sure you can, if you have sufficient research. And for the record, I don&#8217;t believe there is a whole lot of conclusive research on the danger of parabens, I just don&#8217;t think that makes them automatically safe. Neither does a fairly weak sampling of 20 girls with methylparaben in their blood. But still, it&#8217;s not &#8220;misleading&#8230;&#8221; and the fact that parabens have been flagged as potentially dangerous makes me interested in what further research proves, as opposed to interested in pointing and laughing at those who are worried.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heidi</title>
		<link>http://thebeautybrains.com/2008/11/05/ewg-misleads-consumers-about-parabens/comment-page-1/#comment-58052</link>
		<dc:creator>Heidi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 20:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebeautybrains.com/?p=3635#comment-58052</guid>
		<description>Stating that the EWG didn&#039;t cite any research that condemns parabens is irrelevant. You could find that research on your own. 

&quot;People actually put food into their bodies not cosmetics,&quot; 
...transdermal skin patches that administer medication have been shown in many cases to be more effective than those taken orally. Hmm, that&#039;s weird. Maybe it&#039;s because our skin is absorbent. No.. it can&#039;t be...

Attacking health supplement companies did not distract me from the real issue, if that&#039;s what you were going for. I don&#039;t see how that topic is at all relevant. Yeah, that industry has it problems, too. So what?

I consistently find very little &quot;science&quot; in your articles. Just an understanding of basic chemistry, lack of real research, distracting attacks on loosely related parties, and a nice pat on the back to encourage me to march into Walmart&#039;s body wash aisle with my head held high. It&#039;s not that I don&#039;t want to feel safe about the products I use, it&#039;s that you don&#039;t give me ANY legitimate reasons to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stating that the EWG didn&#8217;t cite any research that condemns parabens is irrelevant. You could find that research on your own. </p>
<p>&#8220;People actually put food into their bodies not cosmetics,&#8221;<br />
&#8230;transdermal skin patches that administer medication have been shown in many cases to be more effective than those taken orally. Hmm, that&#8217;s weird. Maybe it&#8217;s because our skin is absorbent. No.. it can&#8217;t be&#8230;</p>
<p>Attacking health supplement companies did not distract me from the real issue, if that&#8217;s what you were going for. I don&#8217;t see how that topic is at all relevant. Yeah, that industry has it problems, too. So what?</p>
<p>I consistently find very little &#8220;science&#8221; in your articles. Just an understanding of basic chemistry, lack of real research, distracting attacks on loosely related parties, and a nice pat on the back to encourage me to march into Walmart&#8217;s body wash aisle with my head held high. It&#8217;s not that I don&#8217;t want to feel safe about the products I use, it&#8217;s that you don&#8217;t give me ANY legitimate reasons to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://thebeautybrains.com/2008/11/05/ewg-misleads-consumers-about-parabens/comment-page-1/#comment-55488</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 02:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebeautybrains.com/?p=3635#comment-55488</guid>
		<description>Aside from it giving men boobies, the other rationale for actually giving some thought to alcohol consumption is that concern about its impact on breast cancer risk is actually in the mainstream. http://www.cancer.org/docroot/PED/content/PED_3_2x_Alcohol_use_and_cancer.asp?sitearea=PED</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aside from it giving men boobies, the other rationale for actually giving some thought to alcohol consumption is that concern about its impact on breast cancer risk is actually in the mainstream. <a href="http://www.cancer.org/docroot/PED/content/PED_3_2x_Alcohol_use_and_cancer.asp?sitearea=PED" rel="nofollow">http://www.cancer.org/docroot/PED/content/PED_3_2x_Alcohol_use_and_cancer.asp?sitearea=PED</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://thebeautybrains.com/2008/11/05/ewg-misleads-consumers-about-parabens/comment-page-1/#comment-55487</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 02:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebeautybrains.com/?p=3635#comment-55487</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I guess I was never worried enough to read the label.  But others had suggested that--similar to what is alleged about parabens--aluminum in antiperspirant is an &quot;endocrine disruptor&quot; that will cause breast cancer if we don&#039;t watch out.  But these same people will say how wonderful soy products are (despite their being phyto-estrogens) because they are all natural and &quot;chemical-free.&quot;  Sorry to be such a grouch, but I imagine some of these same people are drinking a glass of red wine a day per Dr. Oz, although alcohol really DOES give men boobies (and is the one potential everyday &quot;chemical&quot; at least theoretically related to breast cancer that I do think twice about).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I guess I was never worried enough to read the label.  But others had suggested that&#8211;similar to what is alleged about parabens&#8211;aluminum in antiperspirant is an &#8220;endocrine disruptor&#8221; that will cause breast cancer if we don&#8217;t watch out.  But these same people will say how wonderful soy products are (despite their being phyto-estrogens) because they are all natural and &#8220;chemical-free.&#8221;  Sorry to be such a grouch, but I imagine some of these same people are drinking a glass of red wine a day per Dr. Oz, although alcohol really DOES give men boobies (and is the one potential everyday &#8220;chemical&#8221; at least theoretically related to breast cancer that I do think twice about).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thebeautybrains</title>
		<link>http://thebeautybrains.com/2008/11/05/ewg-misleads-consumers-about-parabens/comment-page-1/#comment-55486</link>
		<dc:creator>thebeautybrains</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 02:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebeautybrains.com/?p=3635#comment-55486</guid>
		<description>Interestingly enough, almost no antiperspirants / deodorants contain parabens.  They don&#039;t need to because they contain triclosan which is preservative enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly enough, almost no antiperspirants / deodorants contain parabens.  They don&#8217;t need to because they contain triclosan which is preservative enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

