<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scientists Speak About Cosmetic Animal Testing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thebeautybrains.com/2009/01/19/scientists-speak-about-cosmetic-animal-testing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thebeautybrains.com/2009/01/19/scientists-speak-about-cosmetic-animal-testing/</link>
	<description>Cosmetic chemists answer your beauty product questions!  We are a group of cosmetic scientists who understand what the chemicals used in cosmetics really do, how products are tested, and what all the advertising means.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:10:48 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: thebeautybrains</title>
		<link>http://thebeautybrains.com/2009/01/19/scientists-speak-about-cosmetic-animal-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-44003</link>
		<dc:creator>thebeautybrains</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebeautybrains.com/?p=3936#comment-44003</guid>
		<description>@Jess - Governmental regulations require that all new cosmetic products be proven safe.  The only form of proof that the government accepts as &quot;safe&quot; is animal testing.  No amount of thinking will change that fact.  Until the regulations are changed, animal testing will continue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jess &#8211; Governmental regulations require that all new cosmetic products be proven safe.  The only form of proof that the government accepts as &#8220;safe&#8221; is animal testing.  No amount of thinking will change that fact.  Until the regulations are changed, animal testing will continue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thebeautybrains</title>
		<link>http://thebeautybrains.com/2009/01/19/scientists-speak-about-cosmetic-animal-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-44002</link>
		<dc:creator>thebeautybrains</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebeautybrains.com/?p=3936#comment-44002</guid>
		<description>@jakiefu - Sadly, Left Brain does not know of any new, imaginary, non-animal tested ingredients.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jakiefu &#8211; Sadly, Left Brain does not know of any new, imaginary, non-animal tested ingredients.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackiefu</title>
		<link>http://thebeautybrains.com/2009/01/19/scientists-speak-about-cosmetic-animal-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-43863</link>
		<dc:creator>jackiefu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 23:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebeautybrains.com/?p=3936#comment-43863</guid>
		<description>It would be fair to say that real scientists have a pretty good grasp of evolution - the theory that all current forms of life developed and diversified from earlier forms of life. It&#039;s kind of... recognized worldwide. 

By my reasoning, evolution indicates all forms of life are different but equal. Different in makeup (pardon the pun), but equal. Because we all made it this far. Existence = success. That&#039;s life in a nutshell. Which is why I love when people lament shark attacks. Hello, you&#039;re swimming in its soup, people!

I am a vegetarian. I try to avoid animal products, but it&#039;s impossible. My carnivorous dog eats meat. (So does my carnivorous husband.) Sadly, I cannot bend the universe to my will.

But I do decry animal cruelty. It is 100% unnecessary. Why can&#039;t we ban factory farming? And animal testing? Because nasty things are done by people who make money, and they make more when they streamline the process. And some people hold their hand by insisting that there are no alternatives. 

Innovation in cosmetics?!?! Humans have survived this long without fluffier eyelashes. Here, I&#039;ll solve your innovation problem. I&#039;m going to put all my will and might into creating an alternative for a new sunscreen to prevent skin cancer. EUREKA, I&#039;ve done it. I shall name it &quot;hat&quot; and it shall shade the cells of people everywhere.

There are options when we insist on having them. When I eat eggs, for example, I choose the &quot;free run&quot; option. It costs about a buck more. I find it hard to believe that there&#039;s even a non-free run option.

It kind of breaks my heart that mainstream &quot;against animal testing&quot; and other such claims are bunk. But I admire the heck out of other companies trying to change the status quo. Sure, they are using ingredients once tested on animals, since probably every ingredient has fallen into that category at one point or another. But what else are they going to use? 

Perhaps LeftBrain knows of some magic new imaginary ingredients. 

Keep on making the effort, decent people! Refuse to be discouraged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be fair to say that real scientists have a pretty good grasp of evolution &#8211; the theory that all current forms of life developed and diversified from earlier forms of life. It&#8217;s kind of&#8230; recognized worldwide. </p>
<p>By my reasoning, evolution indicates all forms of life are different but equal. Different in makeup (pardon the pun), but equal. Because we all made it this far. Existence = success. That&#8217;s life in a nutshell. Which is why I love when people lament shark attacks. Hello, you&#8217;re swimming in its soup, people!</p>
<p>I am a vegetarian. I try to avoid animal products, but it&#8217;s impossible. My carnivorous dog eats meat. (So does my carnivorous husband.) Sadly, I cannot bend the universe to my will.</p>
<p>But I do decry animal cruelty. It is 100% unnecessary. Why can&#8217;t we ban factory farming? And animal testing? Because nasty things are done by people who make money, and they make more when they streamline the process. And some people hold their hand by insisting that there are no alternatives. </p>
<p>Innovation in cosmetics?!?! Humans have survived this long without fluffier eyelashes. Here, I&#8217;ll solve your innovation problem. I&#8217;m going to put all my will and might into creating an alternative for a new sunscreen to prevent skin cancer. EUREKA, I&#8217;ve done it. I shall name it &#8220;hat&#8221; and it shall shade the cells of people everywhere.</p>
<p>There are options when we insist on having them. When I eat eggs, for example, I choose the &#8220;free run&#8221; option. It costs about a buck more. I find it hard to believe that there&#8217;s even a non-free run option.</p>
<p>It kind of breaks my heart that mainstream &#8220;against animal testing&#8221; and other such claims are bunk. But I admire the heck out of other companies trying to change the status quo. Sure, they are using ingredients once tested on animals, since probably every ingredient has fallen into that category at one point or another. But what else are they going to use? </p>
<p>Perhaps LeftBrain knows of some magic new imaginary ingredients. </p>
<p>Keep on making the effort, decent people! Refuse to be discouraged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess</title>
		<link>http://thebeautybrains.com/2009/01/19/scientists-speak-about-cosmetic-animal-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-43858</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebeautybrains.com/?p=3936#comment-43858</guid>
		<description>This is full of bull. How are our lives more sacred than animals? I love my pets and I treat them the same as I do with any other human being. There are alternatives for testing if a product is safe or not without the use of animals. If you don&#039;t like animal testing then why are you for it? Just because there&#039;s no animals to test on does not mean that people will stop making new inventions on make-up. We just need to think harder and anything is possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is full of bull. How are our lives more sacred than animals? I love my pets and I treat them the same as I do with any other human being. There are alternatives for testing if a product is safe or not without the use of animals. If you don&#8217;t like animal testing then why are you for it? Just because there&#8217;s no animals to test on does not mean that people will stop making new inventions on make-up. We just need to think harder and anything is possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thebeautybrains</title>
		<link>http://thebeautybrains.com/2009/01/19/scientists-speak-about-cosmetic-animal-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-40869</link>
		<dc:creator>thebeautybrains</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 14:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebeautybrains.com/?p=3936#comment-40869</guid>
		<description>Excellent question JP.  What I mean is that no cosmetics using new technologies will be developed.  That means every cosmetic you use now will be as good as they will ever get.  To improve a cosmetic, you need to develop some kind of new technology.

For example, sunscreens used to leave a white film on people&#039;s skin.  Using new technologies (nanoparticles, new emulsifiers, etc.) formulators were able to reduce that undesirable effect and create the much better products we have today.  Without animal testing, sunscreens would still have the undesirable, whitening effect.

Burts Bees &amp; Toms of Maine don&#039;t have to do animal testing because they use ingredients that have already been animal tested.  They also will not develop any &quot;innovative&quot; products.  Their stories/brands are innovative but that is only because of the story.  Not because of the technology they use.  Anyone can copy a Burts Bees formula.

Getting rid of animal testing will not make cosmetics &#039;de facto&#039; unsafe.  Cosmetics will just be stuck in time &amp; will not develop new technologies to solve problems.  No doubt there will be new stories, but no real, improved products.

Hope that makes sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent question JP.  What I mean is that no cosmetics using new technologies will be developed.  That means every cosmetic you use now will be as good as they will ever get.  To improve a cosmetic, you need to develop some kind of new technology.</p>
<p>For example, sunscreens used to leave a white film on people&#8217;s skin.  Using new technologies (nanoparticles, new emulsifiers, etc.) formulators were able to reduce that undesirable effect and create the much better products we have today.  Without animal testing, sunscreens would still have the undesirable, whitening effect.</p>
<p>Burts Bees &amp; Toms of Maine don&#8217;t have to do animal testing because they use ingredients that have already been animal tested.  They also will not develop any &#8220;innovative&#8221; products.  Their stories/brands are innovative but that is only because of the story.  Not because of the technology they use.  Anyone can copy a Burts Bees formula.</p>
<p>Getting rid of animal testing will not make cosmetics &#8216;de facto&#8217; unsafe.  Cosmetics will just be stuck in time &amp; will not develop new technologies to solve problems.  No doubt there will be new stories, but no real, improved products.</p>
<p>Hope that makes sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
