I got into an interesting exchange with someone recently about this. In reading the following sources (see links below), I'd been led to believe that zinc oxide provides broader UVA coverage than titanium dioxide (assume micronized particles, transparent formulation). Specifically, I've come to understand is that zinc oxide protects better at higher wavelengths within the UVA spectrum (UVA1 versus UVA2). But the person I was in the exchange with said I was mistaken, that titanium dioxide provides equally good UVA protection as long as the concentrations of it in the product are somewhat higher than you would use if formulating with zinc oxide.
This is a quote from the Skin Cancer Foundation article: "Titanium dioxide and zinc oxide, commonly used today in micronized form for a more inconspicuous cosmetic look (these inorganic sunscreens formerly tended to be stark white on the skin), are used singly or combined with other active ingredients to protect against both UVB and UVA (titanium dioxide across the UVA2 spectrum 320–340 nm; zinc oxide against both UVA2 and UVA1—340–380nm)."
Sorry I'm going to keep bumping this one periodically...The answer will determine the range of sunscreens I can trust for my sensitive and melasma-ridden skin.
Thanks a million! If you have a chance, can you let me know what percentage of ZnO would be optimal in a daily sunscreen product? I always thought 5% of more, but may depend on what else is in the formulation (for this question, assume the only actives are ZnO and octinoxate).