I do understant why they put it in shampoos, shower gels or face cleansers. But why on earth would they use it in a cream intended for staying on my face all night long? I am kind of freaking about it now...
No need to freek out it's used as an emulsifier, and probably included at a very low level. These days it's not added directly (it's messy to use when formulating) but as part of an emulsifiy wax or possibly in a polymer suspension.
With very few exceptions you shouldn't judge an ingredient on it's own for things like irritancy or comedogenicity since how they work together that is important.
Agreed. But it's still somehow...inelegant to use SLS as an emulsifier. There's really no need for a high foaming anionic surfactant in an emulsion when there are so many better alternatives. If you ask me, that's just sloppy formulating.
Thanks a lot, guys :) Alchemist, you are right about the low level, it's the last ingredient in the list. Totally agree with you, Right Brain, not elegant at all to use a cheap surfactant as an emulsifier in the cream with the price tag around $70! Oh well, at least i've learnt about another property of SLS apart from removing dirt...
my favourite hand cream has it as first ingredient :( had to stop using it, as I really don't like the thought of it. The fact is the handcream was extra moisturising. How could that be?
Very old school simple formula using an anionic emulsifying wax - ( a blend of cetearyl alcohol, sodium lauryl sulfate, sodium cetearyl sulfate - probably Lanette SX). I suspect the listing is a little incorrect with Isopropyl Myristate and probably Aloe Juice, Gycerin, and maybe propylene glycol belonging before the two sulfates. This sort of error is common when blended raw materials are used.