≡ Menu

Are cosmetics unregulated? The Beauty Brains Show episode 16

Is it true that cosmetics are unregulated and that companies can put anything they want in beauty products? Find out as Perry and I talk about the laws that govern the cosmetics industry. We also discuss a news story about the placebo effect in drugs and cosmetics. Super Special Bonus: Perry uncovers cosmetic chemists in comic books and movies!

If you enjoy our podcast will you PLEASE show your support and buy our new book?

Click here to get your copy for only $2.99

(That’s less than a cup of Starbucks!) 

Click below to play Episode 16: “Are cosmetics unregulated?” or click “download” to save the MP3 file to your computer.

SHOW NOTES

Beauty Science News:  “Half Of A Drug’s Power Comes From Thinking It Will Work”

This report involves a pain medication study and the author says: “Basically we show that words can actually double the effect of a drug. That’s pretty impressive.” Here’s what they tested and what they found:

  • No treatment: 15 percent increase in pain.
  • Known placebo: 26 percent decrease.
  • Placebo labeled Maxalt: 25 percent decrease.
  • Maxalt labeled as placebo: 36 percent decrease.
  • Mystery pill (Maxalt or placebo): 40 percent decrease.
  • Known Maxalt: 40 percent decrease.

The “mind over matter” effect of placebos is similar to what we call the “halo effect” in cosmetics.

Listener question: Sarah wants to know about regulation in the cosmetic industry

The idea that the cosmetic industry is unregulated and that “anyone can put anything in any product” is a myth. In fact, there are 3 levels of regulation to which the industry is subjected: federal, state, self-regulation.

Federal level

The Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act 

  • Prohibits “poisonous or deleterious substances”
  • Restricts particular ingredients
  • Mandates claim substantiation
  • Regulates color additives
  • Requires warning label for coal tar based hair dyes

Important point that causes confusion: The FDC act does NOT require companies must test their products for safety prior to marketing. If the FDA determines that the safety of a product has NOT been substantiated, the product is misbranded (illegal).

What can the FDA do?

  • Prosecution – Criminal charge against the company.
  • Seizure – Federal marshals takes possession of all products.
  • Injunction – Civil action that requires you stop making and distributing the product.
  • Recall – Companies have to pull products off the shelf.

The Fair Packaging and Labeling Act 
Mandates that labels must include the following:

  • Product identity
  • Net contents (also includes provisions against under-filling.)
  • Name and location of manufacturer.
  • List of ingredients.
  • Warning statements (when needed)

The FDA’s Over the Counter Drug review
This is another way the FDA has jurisdiction over cosmetics (at least for cosmetic-drugs)

Other laws which grant additional oversight but not JUST to cosmetics:

Toxic Substances Control Act
Under the jurisdiction of the EPA
Controls single ingredients, not finished products.
No direct authority over cosmetics but if the EPA rules that an ingredient is dangerous, you can expect the FDA will look at it as well and likely consider it to cause the product to be adulterated and therefore it would fall under their jurisdiction under the FDC act.

Federal Trade Commission
Regulates advertising. They prohibit “unfair or deceptive acts or practices affecting commerce.” That’s pretty broad.

The NAD is a second source of advertising regulation They are more likely to challenge cosmetic ads but they don’t really have any authority to take action. Instead what they do is turn the issue over to the FTC.

Consumer Product Safety Commission 
The CPSC has authority over:

  • Soap
  • Hazards presented by cosmetic containers – glass packaging which is breakable, or packages with small parts that could endanger children.
  • Special packaging standards under the Poison Control Act (e.g. child proof caps.)

State regulations
In addition to these federal controls, states are free to pass whatever laws related to cosmetics that they want as long as their laws don’t conflict with federal mandates.

Every state has regulations that apply to soap and cosmetics. Most of them follow the FDA regulations pretty closely, but some have more extensive requirements.  For example:

  • California pioneered legislation which restricts VOCs is determined.
  • Florida requires a “cosmetic manufacturer permit” for any person that manufactures or repackages cosmetics in Florida.
  • Maryland outlawed specific phthalates in cosmetics.

Self-regulation of cosmetics

Finally, on top of all these federal and state restrictions, the cosmetic industry polices itself through the following voluntary registration programs:

  • Registration of manufacturing facilities
  • Registration of cosmetic raw material composition and ingredient statements
  • Filing of adverse product experiences

These all help the government get access to information it needs to ensure safety.

The bottom line
Contrary to what misinformed people may tell you, cosmetics are regulated on three levels: Federal, state, and industry self regulation. You may disagree with the level of regulation or how they are enforced but you can’t honestly claim there are NO regulations. 

LIL buy it now button

Buy your copy of It’s OK to Have Lead in Your Lipstick to learn more about:

  • Clever lies that the beauty companies tell you.
  • The straight scoop of which beauty myths are true and which are just urban legends.
  • Which ingredients are really scary and which ones are just scaremongering by the media to incite an irrational fear of chemicals.
  • How to tell the difference between the products that are really green and the ones that are just trying to get more of your hard earned money by labeling them “natural” or “organic.

Click here for all the The Beauty Brains podcasts.

{ 7 comments… add one }

  • Grace February 4, 2014, 10:40 am

    Promo for the book: bought the first one, gave to a friend after reading. bought the second (kindle version) and have lent it out! Good work. Everyone should purchase.

    • Randy Schueller February 4, 2014, 11:31 am

      Thanks Grace! But I’d thank you even more if your friends bought their own copies. :)

      • Eileen February 4, 2014, 2:46 pm

        OK, so I just bought the Kindle version and skimmed through it during lunch. You guys are funny, informative, and down to earth kind of like TV’s Myth Busters. It was the best $2.99 I’ve spent in quite awhile. And, unlike a couple other well-known blogs that are thinly disguised promotional sites for selling their own products, you guys really know how to keep it real. Thanks for not being shills and for approaching your topics with reason and good humor.

        • Randy Schueller February 4, 2014, 4:44 pm

          @Eileen:-You’ve passed the interview; you’re hired.

          Just kidding! Seriously, thanks for the unsolicited testimonial!

          PS Actually we think that TV’s Myth Busters are like us. (Just kidding again!)

  • Sarah F. February 4, 2014, 10:13 pm

    I thought the caller’s question was really astute;). I am also enjoying the book on kindle.

  • Reitha Weeks February 6, 2014, 10:57 am

    I am interested in your list of actions that FDA can take regarding harmful or mislabeled cosmetics: prosecution, seizure, injunction and recall. Based on the Food Drug and Cosmetic Act, I thought that FDA had to get a court ruling BEFORE they can institute seizures, injunctions and recalls. If that is true, your column doesn’t make that distinction clear.

    If I have my information wrong, please direct me to the laws that I should read. Thanks – I really do like reading your posts!

    Reitha

    • Randy Schueller February 6, 2014, 11:22 am

      Our info was taken from the text book “The Cosmetic Industry: Scientific and Regulatory Foundation.” Per the chapter penned by John A. Wenninger, of the FDA:

      -Prosecution is “a criminal action filed by the FDA against a company.”
      -Seizure is initiated by the FDA “by filing a complaint with the U.S. District Court.”
      -Injunction by definition involves the court system and is a “civil action filed by the FDA.”
      -Recall is voluntary for companies and is “an alternative to FDA-initiated court action.”

      I hope this helps.

Leave a Comment