What are the “best” sunscreen ingredients?

Learn what is really real, in an industry full of fake Forums Ask the Beauty Brains What are the “best” sunscreen ingredients?

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 201 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #96180
    preciousia
    Member

    The other point to make is the size of Zinc Oxide. Badger had a really good article regarding this. They said “Zinc oxide is one of only 17 active ingredients currently approved by the FDA for use in sunscreens. Upon application, zinc oxide particles sit on the outermost layer of your skin, the stratum corneum, where they scatter, absorb, and reflect ultraviolet radiation, protecting your living skin below”. https://www.badgerbalm.com/s-33.aspx?searchEngineName=zinc-oxide-sunscreen-nanoparticles

    The common complaint about Zinc Oxide + Titanium Dioxide is the white cast. Microsizing it seems to help reduce the white cast (though not 100%).  I have taken swatches of the physical sunscreen i have used and shared on my blog, even when they say it is “invisible”, it is definitely NOT invisible! As I have a fair complexion, the white cast does not worry me as much. 

    Microsizing comes with other problems though eg toxicity and UVA/UVB protection.More info on Zinc Oxide and Titanium oxide safety and effectiveness here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3781714/

    As seen in many sources and corroborated in the above article, The size reduction of microsized ZnO and TiO2 increases UVB absorption of both particles at the expense of UVA absorption.

    Am particularly concerned about the production of ROS which @Peter pointed out too.

    #96183
    Peter
    Member

    @RandyS

    The links where I found this info is hard to say. I’ve been studying sunfilters for the last 4 years. All the info comes from studies on Pubmed and from books about Photodermatology. I’ve made an extensive list (that I can’t post here unfortunately), all with references, this is just a summary of what I found. 
    What I didn’t use as sources: regular internet websites, wikipedia, EWG, Paula’s Choice etc. I have to admit I did use wikipedia for finding the molecular weight of the ingredients
    I have used these kind of sources:
    Kerr, 2012 Photoallergenic contact dermatis in Europe
    Colipa, 2012 safety assesment of sunscreen ingredient. These reports contain a summary of all available literature and studies worldwide of the specific sunscreen ingredient (this is my main source).
    Rigel, 2004 Photoaging
    Walters, 2007 Dermatologic, Cosmeceutic and Cosmetic Development
    Kantonslabor, 2006 Sunscreens Photostability
    VanBroek, 2012 Chemische en fysische zonfilters: Welke is the beste keuze
    Bos, 2000 the 500 Dalton Rule for skin penetration
    Wang, 2016 Principles and Practice of Photoprotection
    Lim, 2007 Photodermatology
    and a dozen articles of Pubmed…
    My criteria for ranking: what I find most important is that sunscreens don’t have hormonal activity, are not easily absorbed, are not prone to photodegradation or are common (photo)allergens. What I didn’t consider was if they leave a white cast or if they have an unpleasent skin feeling for example.
    The newer sunscreens like Tinosorb and Uvasorb HEB don’t show any photodegradation, after irradiation, 100% of the sunscreen is recovered. Some show some degradation, eg 3%, but even then I consider it as none. Octisalate or Avobenzone, without stabilizing, can degrade with 30% to 55%. Although stabilizing reduces this, you don’t know exactly for how long, if it will last during the whole day, and if there may be iteractions with other ingredients (like your powder with titanium dioxide). Knowing there are really stable ingredients, I would rather choose the stable ones. I’m not saying you should avoid all sunscreens, only the filters from 22-27 are doubtfull, and in my opinion should be avoided.
    #96185
    Peter
    Member
    Based on the percentage of Zinc Oxide doesn’t tell you anything about the SPF-value of a product. There are so many factor influencing that. In general the UVA-protection will drop micronizing Zinc Oxide, while the UVB protection will increase as @preciousia explains..


    http://pubs.rsc.org/services/images/RSCpubs.ePlatform.Service.FreeContent.ImageService.svc/ImageService/Articleimage/2010/PP/b9pp00178f/b9pp00178f-f2.gif


    #96186
    preciousia
    Member

    @Peter You certainly are very knowledgeable about sunscreens and that shows. I like how you ranked the ingredients. Effectiveness is key and white cast/discomfort is not as important (to me at least).

    What a labour of love that you share with the rest of us! Thank you, Peter! so appreciative of your research.
    Tinasorb has been around for a while so, I believe that there had been adequate research. Do you know if the research is independent (aka not funded by BASF)?
    @Peter  Tinorsorb absorbs UV.  My concern is what really happens to the skin when sunscreen is absorbed? As I suffer from mild pigmentation due to my fair skin and genetics as well as UV damage, I was advised to use “physical sunscreen” like titanium dioxide and zinc oxide by the dermatologist. As you have researched, it’s not completely “reflective” of all the sun rays, some of it is absorbed as well.
    I am motivated to buy a sunscreen with active ingredients: Tinasorb S & M + Antioxidants to protect from UVA, UVB & IRA.Will try that after this horrid summer. Today’s Max UV is 8 :( and i am meeting a friend to go walk by the beach. Ack.  See this: http://www.arpansa.gov.au/uvindex/realtime/syd_rtr.htm
    #96189
    Peter
    Member

    @preciousia

    I pressume the research is independant. The articles from Colipa for example are used for approving sunscreen actives in Europe, they only used independant good quality research.
    The real non-nano physical sunscreens reflect most of the UV radiation, however “recent findings indicate that the primary means of protection is by absorption (95%) and the remaining 5% by scattering and reflecting” (Wang, 2016: Principles and Practice of Photoprotection p.168).

    A sunscreen like Tinosorb M has a similar way of protection, mostly absorption, but also some reflection and scattering and it gives good UVA protection very far in the UVA-spectrum. So a very good hybrid. Uvinal A Plus is like an improved version of Avobenzone, very good UVA protection and very stable. Ethylhexyl Triazone offers very high UVB protection, meaning very low concentrations are necessary to obtain high SPF numbers. Uvasorb HEB is considered an improved version of Ethylhexyl Triazone. It depends on where you live what sunscreens you can choose from, I think the first 8 sunscreen actives really are a step ahead of the other actives in my list, but they are not available in every country.
    #96194
    preciousia
    Member

    I’ll look out for the first 8 ingredients in sunscreens. Thank you for sharing Peter! Is it true that the risks of Zinc Oxide and Titanium Dioxide is only because of micro-sizing/nano sizing? What if they are encapsulated ZnO and TiO2? You did share a little on this here: thread: http://thebeautybrains.com/bbforum/index.php?p=/discussion/1122/does-coating-sunscreen-nano-particles-get-rid-of-all-side-effects#latest

    @Peter  Assuming that coating ZnO and TiO2 removes the risks of ROS completely. How would you rank ZnO and TiO2?

    For this summer, i am sticking to Zinc oxide. I just got burnt again by UV8 on Sunday despite brief exposure to the sun, we cancelled going to the beach. My friend suggested that I avoid chemical sunscreens completely and stick to physical mineral sunscreens totally.

    So good to know that the research is independent. Tinosorb S which you ranked number 1 has been approved by the European Union since the year 2000, also approved here in Australia. I am going to try a local brand Skinstitut’s sunscreen that contains Tinorsorb S, Tinosorb M + antioxidant (which will be good for IRA).
    My new addition to my sunscreen wardrobe is the 27% Zinc Oxide i have recently bought.
    I’ll start using this on the face tomorrow. It’s meant more for the body but after 2 recent sunburns in a mere week, I think I need to play it safe. :( despite my efforts of wearing a broad brim hat, high SPF sunscreen in thick layers as advised by the dermatologist, sunglasses, seeking shade… it’s not enough. :(

    Also just bought today, another French brand mineral sunscreen.
    Ingredients can be found here.
    #96195
    preciousia
    Member

    Particularly keen on this other discussion


    What other ingredients should we look out for total photoprotection?

    Some notes from this article: http://www.skintherapyletter.com/2010/15.4/2.html They mentioned  antioxidants, osmolytes, and DNA repair enzymes. 

    #96196
    preciousia
    Member

    If anyone have good sunscreens they have used and like, please chip in and share! With the advent of internet shopping, I can buy pretty much buy anything from anywhere  😡

    I’ll be testing the sunscreens under Australian sun. May the best sunscreen win.
    #96201

    Probably not up to the standards in Australia, but I use Blue Lizard for Faces on my face. Their advertising says they use Australian standards for formulation, hence the name. Cosmetically elegant, no. Effective? Yes. It worked well in the Caribbean while on vacation in September. It is zinc oxide based. To reapply I used Neutrogena Ultra Sheer Face and Body Sick Sunscreen. I wore a hat and sunglasses at all times when outdoors.

    Here are links to both items on Amazon, for reference.
    and
    The stick was easy to carry and to reapply.
    For other exposed skin, on beach days, I used Water Babies by Coppertone (zinc based) as a base and reapplied with Ocean Potion spray spf 50 (that one is reef friendly, the spf 70 is not – rub it in after spraying on!!) every hour and a half or so. I can’t take much sun so I covered up before I had too much exposure to the sun.
    The Caribbean was a challenge because of mosquitos carrying the Zika virus. Using insect repellant makes the sunscreen less effective and using sunscreen make the insect repellant less effective. 
    I elected to get a spray to treat clothing and gear with and to wear long sleeves and long pants.
    Thanks to all those who have contributed to this thread. Highly interesting!
    #96206
    Peter
    Member

    @preciousia

    The research on Zinc Oxide and Titanium Dioxide concludes by saying that the formation of reactive oxygen species can be reduces up to 99% by coating them. Also the particles are not absorbed further than the stratum corneum. There is some uncertainty about the stability of the coatings and the penetration of the particles. But if you believe the final opinion they certainly are very good filters.
    I’ve tried the Uriage sunscreen but it does leave a white cast. Tinosorb M can leave a slight white cast as well though, the Avene Emulsion Fragrance free contains for example Tinosorb M, Tinosorb S, Uvasorb HEB and Avobenzone.
    About the other ingredients for protection against IR. Well UV-filters absorb radiation and turn this in to heat, so into IR radiation. Theoretically the particles that reflect or scatter the radiation will generate less heat (physical/Tinosorb M). The combination of Vitamin C/Vitamin E is a golden standard, but also ingredients like Resveratrol, Caffein, Ubiquinone, Grape Seed Extract and Niacinamde have been researched quite a lot. 
    #96207
    preciousia
    Member

    @lindygirl1960 


    I had included Blue Lizard on my Mineral Sunscreen List here
    How odd that it is Australian, I found it in my research… Oddly, I have not seen it on the shelves here. lol I do like how the bottle turns blue when exposed to UV! Active ingredients: Zinc Oxide 8.0%, mix of chemical and physical filters)



    By the way, I was out at 12+ noon today in max UV8. Protected by my 27% Zinc Oxide, sunglasses + broad brim hat. No sunburn. Invisible Zinc rocks. It wasn’t as bad as i thought but boy was my face white! I applied some bb cream and pressed powder and no more white face :)

    After getting burnt 2x in a week with my physical + chemical sunscreen, i had to be careful. I am very fair, and i use tretinoin so that makes me more photosensitive.
    #96208
    preciousia
    Member

    @Peter Is it safe to say that if we stick to the established brands, that the technology of coated Zinc Oxide / Titanium Dioxide will be stable? 

    Nothing is 100% But I guess 99% is good enough for me. There is no perfect sunscreen as Dr Todorov of smartskincare.com has concluded. There are pros and cons to both physical and chemical.
    For physical filters, I rather get a more “water resistant/rub proof formulae” that doesn’t rub off easily. I noticed with my Moogoo zinc oxide sunscreen, i tend to rub some off without realising. If it results in a cosmetic unfriendly sunscreen, I’ll bear and grit with it. 
    Reapplication of sunscreen is another headache for us gals. Reapplication over makeup is very difficult. 
    Any idea if Zinc Oxide / Titantium Dioxide is toxic when breathed in? I thought i read it somewhere but am not too sure. @lindygirl1960  did mention a very good point about reef friendly sprays! Any idea what are the culprit ingredients that are not friendly for the marine life?
    #96212
    preciousia
    Member

    Thought you all may be keen on Dr Todorov’s insights into the different sunscreen ingredients:

    #96213
    escherichia
    Member

    Sorry! Got eaten up by work…

    And wow, many thanks to Peter and Preciousia. Such valuable info.
    Peter,
    There are many Asian sunscreens with the stable UV filters that you like, such as Uvinul A Plus. I used to use this: 
    Very cosmetically elegant. Dries down to a matte texture, not tacky etc. Preciousia might wanna check out this too. NO white cast since it’s mainly chemical filters.
    Unfortunately, I’m allergic (I think) to all chemical filters so I can’t use this. I have like 4 brand new bottles of this sitting in my closet… I dunnoe what to do with it haha. It’s just so frustrating that I can’t use them because obv, they are good sunscreens. argh.
    Preciousia,
    Badger’s sunscreen feels good on my skin. I bought one but gosh, the white cast. I don’t think I can use this. Even a very thin layer makes me look like a ghost (I’m not pale enough haha). I may use this at home.. how do you put BB creams over your sunblock to offset that white cast? I find that anything I put over my sunblock disturbs the layer. :(
    I think you should try Asian sunscreens if you can take chemical filters. 
    I’m not a sunscreen expert but if you put on 27% ZnO sunscreen on your skin and u are still burning… I don’t know. Did you apply a thick enough layer?  
    #96214
    escherichia
    Member

    BTW Preciousia, I can’t see your blog or the photos… 

    The high ZnO sunscreens u use; don’t they give you a white cast? 
    I actually went to my local Whole Foods the other day, and swatched all the physical sunscreens they have (be it ZnO, TiO2 or combination of both; all contain between 15-20% physical filters). Major white cast. I’m about MAC NC25 (medium? def. not dark…)
    Badger’s 18% ZnO gave me white cast. Avene’s mineral sunscreen (20% IIRC?) too. I’m really getting a bit downhearted now. I think there’s just no way for me not to look like a ghost with high ZnO sunscreens. 
    In the end, I ordered a Korean physical sunscreen (no % of ZnO or TiO2 listed so prob low) that my friend likes (i.e. minimal white cast) from ebay. I think the more important thing is for me to have minimal sun protection rather than go out with NO protection because of the white cast. 
Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 201 total)
  • The forum ‘Ask the Beauty Brains’ is closed to new topics and replies.
The Beauty Brains